The Miller Law Firm

The Miller Law Firm
   Online Press7/4/2009 8:06:31 PM   
Suing the Builder is Getting Tougher

The Wall Street Journal, Evan Perez

January 23, 2003 - If your new dream home turns out to have serious flaws, you may have to give your builder a chance to fix the problem before taking him to court.

The nation's home builders, fighting what they say is a surge in construction-defects lawsuits, are appealing to state legislatures to help slow consumer lawsuits.

Builders are behind "right to cure" laws that have been passed in recent months in California, Washington, Arizona and Nevada, and builders are aiming for at least 13 more states in coming months. The National Association of Home Builders, a Washington D.C., residential builders lobby, today plans to announce its national push for such legislation at its national convention in Las Vegas.

The laws generally set up a procedure for homeowners to give builders a chance to repair their homes before they can file a lawsuit. But, while the requirement sounds logical, some consumer advocates fear builders will gain an advantage over unsophisticated home buyers, who may sign away their rights to sue later if the problem isn't fixed properly.

Tom Miller, a Newport Beach, Calif., lawyer who has built a national specialty of suing home builders, says "right-to-cure" laws benefit builders more than consumers.

He predicts that the laws will get rid of roughly half of home-defect lawsuits. "It will do away with a lot of small to medium construction-defect cases, those under $500,000," he says. But the many, bigger multimillion-dollar cases involving hundreds of homeowners, he says, will continue to plague builders who make mistakes. "I'm not going out of business because of this new law," Mr. Miller says.


The law passed in Washington state, which is being used as a model for proposed legislation in other states, calls for homeowners to alert a builder, at least 45 days before suit is filed, that they believe there is a defect. The builders then have 21 days to respond by either doing an inspection, disputing the claim and refusing to fix it, or proposing a settlement.

Builders this year are targeting legislatures in Alaska, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina and Wisconsin.

The U.S. Commerce Department reported this week that housing start surged to an estimated 1.7 million in 2002, the highest since 1986. With it has come a boom in construction-defect claims, builders say. There are a few national statistics, but one indicator of the surge in claims is the effect on the builder's general-liability insurance market, with rising premiums and insurers curtailing coverage. The construction-defect problem is considered one of the most serious problems in the insurance market today," says Bob Hartwig, chief economist for the Insurance Information Institute in New York.

Karen Reutter, a senior vice president of Willis Group, a London-based insurance broker, says some of her large U.S. residential-construction clients have faced premium increases of 400% to 600% over the past year. Builders will eventually pass along the costs to consumers, she predicts.

Plaintiffs lawyers and consumer advocates complain that builders are largely to blame for the spate of lawsuits because many have come to rely on cheaper labor. They often cite builders' own complaints about the scarcity of skilled labor in the booming housing industry.

The Council of Better Business Bureaus, Arlington, Va., says it recorded 4,323 complaints against home builders in 2001, the No. 23 spot on the list of more than 1,000 types of businesses. (Car dealers were No. 1, with 19,404 for complaints.) The builder complaints were up 8% from 3,996 in 1999.

The lawsuit problems for builders have exacerbated an already difficult insurance market. The September 11, 2001, attacks in the U.S. and the depressed stock market have hurt insurers. In many states, many insurance carriers have simply stopped writing certain policies. Those that have remained have raised premiums or narrowed the coverage.

Harry Elliott, president of Elliott Homes, a builder in Sacramento, Calif., and an architect of legislation in that state, says California builders just a few years ago had a choice of 35 insurance companies for liability coverage that now have only six.


What's New - Consumer Guide - Firm Information - Online Press
Construction Defects - Law & Legislation - Claim Development - Client Services
Upcoming Events - Verdicts & Settlements - Online Resources
Miller Publications - Disaster Relief - Construction Defect Seminars - Contact Us - Home

© Copyright 2009 The Miller Law Firm.  All rights Reserved.
If you experience problems or have questions, contact us at Info@ConstructionDefects.com.